philosophy of media – medieninitiative

Norms in the Age of Intelligent Machines: Bodies, Knowledge, Governmentality — Dec. 4 & 5 at Stanford

Norms in the Age of Intelligent Machines — a two-day conference organized by Shane Denson, Armen Khatchatourov, and Johan Fredrikzon and sponsored by the France-Stanford Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Villa Albertine, and the Stanford Department of Art & Art History — will take place at Stanford on December 4-5, 2025.

Speakers
Morehshin Allahyari (Stanford)
Hannes Bajohr (UC Berkeley)
David Bates (UC Berkeley)
Bilel Benbouzid (University Gustave Eiffel, Paris)
Shane Denson (Stanford)
Jean-Pierre Dupuy (Stanford)
Noel Fitzpatrick (TU Dublin)
Johan Fredrikzon (KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm)
Julia Irwin (Stanford)
Armen Khatchatourov (DICEN / University Gustave Eiffel, Paris)
Helen Nissenbaum (Cornell Tech)
Warren Sack (UC Santa Cruz)
Antonio Somaini (University Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3)
Fred Turner (Stanford)

The prospect of intelligent machines challenges our societal norms. Matters of debate over the past half century concerning digital networks – e.g. access, privacy, subjectivity, participation – must be reconsidered in the age of machine learning. More specifically, the proliferation of AI-based systems leads to new ways of understanding what normativity is. Social norms don’t change overnight; however, the mechanisms and processes that drive these changes are increasingly influenced by AI-based infrastructures, characterized by a heightened level of automation, while being opaque, inscrutable, and anthropomorphic.

Faced with such conditions, we have to ask, first, what it means to instill or break a norm and, second, what norms even mean or represent. This landscape presents both profound challenges to maintain just and stable means of interaction and, at the same time, novel and creative opportunities for alternative modes of being.

The two conferences (December 4-5, 2025 at Stanford, April or May in Paris) aim to investigate how norms of embodiment, forms of knowledge, and techniques of governmentality operate in the age of AI, and to address the imbrication of two movements: how the evolution of social norms is reflected in new algorithmic practices, and how these algorithms influence social norms in various domains. It will bring together the humanities, social sciences, and law to address issues of crucial contemporary importance.

Sponsored by France – Stanford Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Villa Albertine, and Stanford Department of Art & Art History

Image: Brett Amory, Archive Drift ⧑⧗⧖⧔. Photo: Shaun Roberts

More info here

View the full conference program with agenda, abstracts, and speaker bios

Registration

New Article: “On the Very Idea of a (Synthetic) Conceptual Scheme” — Out now in Philosophy and Digitality

My article “On the Very Idea of a (Synthetic) Conceptual Scheme” has just been published in the open access journal Philosophy & Digitality, in a special issue on “LLMs and the Patterns of Human Language Use.”

The title of the piece plays on, and the article draws substantially on, Donald Davidson’s “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.” By way of this classic text, I engage closely with M. Beatrice Fazi’s provocative article “The Computational Search for Unity: Synthesis in Generative AI.” I agree with Fazi that we have to take the outputs of LLMs as genuine language (contra the “stochastic parrots” crew), and that the best way to account for their operations is in terms of a kind of philosophical “synthesis.” But whereas Fazi sees LLMs synthesizing their own individual “worlds within,” I argue that the genuineness of their linguistic outputs (i.e. the fact that they produce real language) instead suggests that they refer to a world shared in common with human language-users (which commonality should not, however, detract from their alterity or alienness to our embodied Lebensform, or form of life).

In the same issue of Philosophy & Digitality, Fazi has a response to my article, titled “A Transcendental Philosophy of Large Language Models,” which I also highly recommend, and which brings our differences—as well as agreements—into sharper relief. I have the feeling this is the beginning of a longer exchange!

I’d like to thank Sybille Krämer and Christoph Durt for inviting my participation in the special issue and shepherding it toward publication–and for soliciting Fazi’s response. And thanks, above all, to Beatrice Fazi for producing such thought-provoking work in the philosophy of AI and computation!

Syllabus: Media Technology Theory — Stanford 2020 (co-taught with Fred Turner)

Denson Turner Media Tech Theory Syllabus 2020 by medieninitiative on Scribd

Syllabus for “Media Technology Theory,” which I’ll be co-teaching Spring 2020 with Fred Turner.