Introducing the film|minutes video|graphic workstation

I made a piece of software! It’s called the film|minutes video|graphic workstation. It’s pretty niche but cool if you want to take notes or do very close readings of films/videos.

It’s a combination video player and text editor designed for close analysis of moving image media in scholarly research and academic writing, including student writing about film and video. The app plays videos on loop, one minute at a time, while the user enters notes or commentary on that segment. Timestamped notes are saved as txt files that can be reloaded and revised at a later time. Accordingly, the app serves either as a writing tool (as an informal notebook, for example, or for composing more complex and detailed close readings of films) or as a platform for reading previously compiled texts. The app was designed to facilitate the type of writing featured in Lever Press’s film|minutes book series, from which the workstation takes its name. Each book in the series takes a minute-by-minute approach to an individual film and conducts a close analysis on this basis. I am also the author of the first book in the series, on the 1935 film Bride of Frankenstein. A demo featuring the video and corresponding text of the first ten minutes of the book/film are included in the app.

In addition to its use as a tool for writing, the app promotes reflection on the relation of text and image in an age of digital media, where conventional scholarly writing now competes with “videographic criticism” (or video essays). Instituting what might be called a videographic method, though not necessarily producing a strictly videographic product, the film|minutes video|graphic workstation invites users to reflect on the status of the seen (video) and the written (graphic) more generally.

Accordingly, the app continues a series of videographic and critical making projects aimed at probing the edges of what is possible in video as a self-reflexive medium for theory — not just a vehicle or container medium for theorization but a platform that potentially creates new modes of looking and seeing. My video essay “Sight and Sound Conspire: Monstrous Audio-Vision in James Whale’s Frankenstein (1931)” is an intertext in more ways than one; while it is more or less technically conventional, in that it is a linear video with beginning, middle, and end, its formal structure of repetition and variation on a single scene anticipates the kind of close looking that the film|minutes workstation (and the film|minutes book series) promotes. (More obviously, the focus on Frankenstein films is of course another point of conversation.) My interactive video essay “Don’t Look Now: Paradoxes of Suture” subsequently challenged the linear form and experimented with spatializing and looping structures to foster close looking; the film|minutes video|graphic workstation inherits from it the focus on interactivity and the loop. My critical making project “The Algorithmic Nickelodeon” went even further outside the bounds of linear video, using data from an EEG headset to influence playback in realtime and thus to open the focusing and capture of attention to scrutiny. While the film|minutes video|graphic workstation does not stage quite so radical a disruption of the video source, perhaps it opens similarly self-reflexive questions around the way, as Nietzsche put it, “our writing utensils work alongside us in the formation of our thoughts.” That is, the medium in and through which we write and think — whether that is pen and paper, word processor, or nonlinear digital editing platform — is not neutral with respect to the things we conceive and express. It is my hope that the film|minutes video|graphic workstation will help us to think through the transformation of writing about moving-image media in conjunction with ubiquitous digital video.

The app is open access (CC-BY-NC-SA) and available for Windows and Mac. You can download it here: https://doi.org/10.25740/xq320wq3449.

Video: Leonardo Art Science Evening Rendezvous (LASER) Talks, June 10, 2024

Thanks to Piero Scaruffi for inviting me to present at the Leonardo Art Science Evening Rendezvous (LASER) series here at Stanford last night, alongside Virginia San Fratello, Fiorenza Micheli, and Tom Mullaney. It was a great conversation, with lots of unexpected resonances!

Don’t Look Now: From Flawed Experiment in Videographic Interactivity to New Open-Source Tool — Interactive Video Grid

Back in 2016, my experimental video essay “Don’t Look Now: Paradoxes of Suture” was published in the open access journal [in]Transition: Journal of Videographic Film and Moving Image Studies. This was an experiment with the limits of the “video essay” form, and a test to see if it could accommodate non-linear and interactive forms (produced with some very basic javascript and HTML/CSS so as to remain accessible and viewable even with updates to web infrastructures). Seeing as the interactive video essay was accepted and published in a peer-reviewed journal devoted, for the most part, to more conventional linear video essays, I considered the test passed. (However, since the journal has recently moved to a new hosting platform with Open Humanities Library, the interactive version is no longer included directly on the site, instead linking to my own self-hosted version here.)

But even if the test was passed in terms of publication, the peer reviewers noted that the experiment was not altogether successful. Richard Misek noted that the piece was “flawed,” qualifying nevertheless that “the work’s limitations are integral to its innovation.” The innovation, according to Misek, was to point to a new way of looking and doing close analysis:

“Perhaps one should see it not as a self-contained video essay but as a walk-through of an early beta of an app for viewing and manipulating video clips spatially. Imagine, for example… The user imports a scene. The app then splits it into clips and linearly spatializes it, perhaps like in Denson’s video. Each clip can then be individually played, looped, or paused. For example, the user can scroll to, and then pause, the in points or out points for each clip; or just play two particular shots simultaneously and pause everything else. Exactly how the user utilizes this app depends on the film and what they hope to discover from it. The very process of doing this, of course, may then also reveal previously unnoticed themes, patterns, or equivalences. Such a platform for analyzing moving images could hugely faciliate close formal analysis. I imagine a moving image version of Warburg’s Mnemosyne Atlas – a wall (/ screen) full of images, all existing in spatial relation with each other, and all in motion; a field of connections waiting to be made.

“In short, I think this video points towards new methods of conducting close analysis rather than new methods of presenting it. In my view, the ideal final product would not be a tidied-up video essay but an app. I realize that, technically and conceptually, this is asking a lot. It would be a very different, and much larger project. For now, though, this video provides an inspiring demo of what such an app could help film analysts achieve.”

Fast-forward eight years, to a short article on “Five Video Essays to Close Out May,” published on May 28, 2024 in Hyperallergic. Here, author Dan Schindel includes a note about an open-source and open-access tool, the Interactive Video Grid by Quan Zhang, that is inspired by my video essay and aims to realize a large part of the vision laid out by Misek in his review. As one of two demos of the tool, which allows users to create interactive grids of video clips for close and synchronous analysis, Zhang even includes “Don’t Look Now: Paradoxes of Suture. A Reconfiguration of Shane Denson’s Interactive Video Essay.”

I’m excited to experiment with this in classrooms, or as an aid in my own research. And I can imagine that additional development might point to further innovations in modes of looking. For example, what if we make the grid dynamic, such that the clips can be dragged and rearranged? Or added and removed, resized, slowed down or speeded up, maybe even superimposed on one another? Of course, many such transformations are already possible within nonlinear digital editing platforms — but it’s only the editing process that is nonlinear, while the operations imagined here only become visible in the outputted products that are, alas, still linear videos.

Like my original video, Zhang’s new tool might also be “flawed” and in need of further development, but it is successful in terms of pointing to new ways of looking that go beyond linear forms of film and video and that take fuller advantage of the underlying nonlinearity of digital media. The latter, I would suggest, are anyway transforming our modes of visual attention, so it seems only right that we should experiment self-reflexively and probe the limits of the new ways of looking.

Life in Pixels ft. Brooke Belisle and Shane Denson (Interview/joint book discussion with Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal)

Online now: Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal’s discussion with me and Brooke Belisle about our books Post-Cinematic Bodies and Depth Effects. Check it out!

“Why Are Things So Weird?” — Kevin Munger on Flusser’s COMMUNICOLOGY

I just stumbled upon this interesting looking video response from Kevin Munger to Vilém Flusser’s Communicology: Mutations in Human Relations?, which appeared in the “Sensing Media” book series that I edit with Wendy Chun for Stanford University Press.

The above (posted on Twitter here) is an excerpt of a longer video accessible if you subscribe to the New Models Patreon or Substack. I haven’t subscribed, so I’m 100% sure what to expect, but it looks provocative!

Video: Erich Hörl, “The Disruptive Condition” (Oct. 5, 2022 at Digital Aesthetics Workshop)

We’re still getting used to the hybrid setup, so the framing isn’t always great, but I’m happy to share the video of Erich Hörl’s talk at the Digital Aesthetics Workshop: “The Disruptive Condition.”

SCREENTIME: An Exhibition of Desktop Videos

On display from January 6 to January 27, 2022 in Stanford’s McMurtry Building (home of the Department of Art & Art History) is SCREENTIME: An Exhibition of Desktop Videos.

The exhibition grows out of a collaboration between Stanford and Occidental College — between Shane Denson’s class “The Video Essay: Writing with Video about Media and Culture” and Allison de Fren’s “The Video Essay,” both of which were taught in Fall 2021.

Students in each class met online and worked through some of the more troubling aspects of online life, including online racism, radicalization, pornography, and politics. The resulting videos, all of which use the computer desktop as both a topic and a medium, reflect the troubled times of contemporary screentime, and the sonic cacophony in the exhibition space challenges viewers to come to terms with the ways that screens today compete for our attention.

Included in the exhibition are eleven remarkable videos:

I Love Kanye (2021) — D’Andre Jorge (sophomore, Stanford)

A Letter to My Younger Self, on the Dangers of the Internet (2021) — David Kolifrath (freshman, Occidental)

The Commercialization of Self Image (2021) — Ashton Berg (sophomore, Stanford)

Solace in Schadenfreude: r/HermanCainAward and Vaccine Misinformation (2021) — Tejas Narayanan (sophomore, Stanford)

A Brief Inquiry into Cultural Appropriation and Misogynoir Online (2021) — Micah Drigo (sophomore, Stanford)

Kids Content on YouTube (2021) — Finian Walsh (sophomore, Occidental)

Bots and Trolls and Hackers, Oh My! A Story of Russian Interference (2021) — Katherine Crandell (junior, Stanford)

Let’s Talk about Porn (2021) — Henry Liera (senior, Stanford)

Sustainable Brands and the Limits of “Radical Transparency” (2021) — Georgia Crawford (freshman, Occidental)

The Shallows of Hate (2021) — Ben Fischer (sophomore, Stanford)

Tiktok’s Devious Licks Trend (2021) — Zahir Choudhry (freshman, Occidental)

Video: Sensations of History and Discorrelated Images: James Hodge and Shane Denson in Conversation

Above, the complete video from the conversation on April 2, 2021 between James Hodge and myself about our new books, Sensations of History and Discorrelated Images. Co-sponsored by the Center for Global Culture and Communication at Northwestern University and the Linda Randall Meier Research Workshop on Digital Aesthetics at Stanford University.

Video: “Post-Cinematic Bodies” (Mercator Lecture, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt)

The video of my Mercator Lecture for the Configurations of Film Graduiertenkolleg at the Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, “Post-Cinematic Bodies” (from November 23, 2020), is now online. Hope you enjoy!

Videos of Two Recent Book-Related Talks

Discorrelation, or: Images between Algorithms and Aesthetics — Nov. 3, 2020 at CESTA, Stanford University

Here are videos of two recent talks related to my book Discorrelated Images. Above, a talk titled “Discorrelation, or: Images between Algorithms and Aesthetics,” delivered at Stanford’s Center for Spatial and Textual Analysis (CESTA) on November 3, 2020. And below, a talk titled “Discorrelated Images” from October 26, 2020 at UC Santa Barbara’s Media Arts and Technology Seminar Series.

Discorrelated Images — October 26, 2020 at MAT Seminar Series, UCSB