“What Do We (Really) Want from AI?” — Ge Wang at Digital Aesthetics Workshop, Nov. 14, 2023

For our second Digital Aesthetics workshop of the year, please join us in welcoming Ge Wang, who will present on “Artful Design and Artificial Intelligence: What do we (really) want from AI?” on November 14, 5-7PM PT. The event will take place in the Stanford Humanities Center Watt Dining Room, where refreshments will be served. Below you will find an abstract and bio, as well as a poster for lightweight circulation. We look forward to seeing you there!

Zoom link for those unable to join in-person: tinyurl.com/yc5t7wde

Abstract:

We all design, shaping the world around us in the form of tools, policies, education, and communities. In recent months we’ve seen the growing emergence of “astoundingly competent” AI tools, leading many of us to wonder how AI might soon impact our work, our lives, our world. How do we (want to) live and work with artificial intelligence? How might we artfully design tools and systems that balance machine automation and human interaction? And perhaps the most basic question of all, what do we (really) want from AI?

In this presentation, we will engage with these questions through an artful design lens, considering factors such as aesthetics, ethics, and accountability. As a case study, we will draw from the teaching of “Music and AI”, a critical-making course at Stanford, and explore the power of human creativity in using AI not as an “oracle”, but as a tool for creative expression.

Bio:

Ge Wang is an Associate Professor at Stanford University’s Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA). He researches the artful design of tools, toys, games, musical instruments, programming languages, expressive VR experiences, and interactive AI systems with humans in the loop. Ge is the architect of the ChucK audio programming language, the director of the Stanford Laptop Orchestra and the Stanford VR Design Lab. He is the Co-founder of Smule and the designer of the Ocarina and Magic Piano apps for mobile phones. He is a Senior Fellow and a Associate Directory of Stanford Human-Centered AI Institute. A 2016 Guggenheim Fellow,Ge is the author of /Artful Design: Technology in Search of the Sublime/, a photo comic book about how we shape technology — and how technology shapes us.

“The Negative Aesthetic of AI” — Luciana Parisi at Digital Aesthetics Workshop, Oct. 20, 2023

We are happy to announce the first Digital Aesthetics Workshop event of the year. Please join us in welcoming Luciana Parisi, who will present on “The negative aesthetic of AI” on October 20, 2-4PM PT. The event will take place in the Stanford Humanities Center Boardroom, where refreshments will be served. Below you will find the abstract and bio attached, as well as a poster for lightweight circulation. We look forward to seeing you there!

Zoom link for those unable to join in-person: tinyurl.com/3fx49d8p  

Abstract:

Does AI have an aesthetic form? Perhaps one can argue that this form may entail a thinking without self-reflectivity and yet one may still hang on a function of imagination for artificial thinking. But one cannot neglect that self-reflectivity precisely defines the procedure by which reason is supplemented by imagination – a generative function that grants the system not to fall into its dogmatic premises. From this standpoint, the function of imagination seems to collide with the role of noise and randomness in generative AI. The scope here however is not to establish a direct correlation between imagination and noise or even to argue for a machine aesthetics that carries through the project of aesthetic judgment in the moment of the sublime, namely the encounter with the incalculable and the unmeasurable. Instead of a prosthetic extension of aesthetic judgement, this talk discusses   the negative function of imagination in Generative AI as an instance of a negation of aesthetics: a socio-techno-genic insurgence of radical alienness  from where the recursive iteration of the sublime fails its task of rebooting the system.

Bio:

Luciana Parisi’s research lays at the intersection of continental philosophy, information sciences, digital media, computational technologies. Her writings investigate technology in terms of ontological and epistemological possibilities of transformation in culture, aesthetics and politics. Her publications address the techno-capitalist investment in artificial intelligence, biotechnology, nanotechnology to explore challenges to conceptions of gender, race and class. She has also written extensively within the fields of media philosophy and computational design in order to investigate metaphysical possibilities of instrumentality. 

She was a member of the CCRU (Cybernetic Culture Research Unit) and currently a co-founding member of CCB (Critical Computation Bureau) through which she co-ideated the Symposium Recursive Colonialism, Artificial Intelligence and Speculative Computation (Dec 2020) https://recursivecolonialism.com/home/

In 2004, she published Abstract Sex: Philosophy, Biotechnology and the Mutations of Desire, which investigates capitalist experimentations in molecular strata of nature together with non-linear theories of endosymbiosis to argue against biocentric models of sexual reproduction and conceptions of sex and gender in terms of biodigital replications and non-filiative bacterial sex. Her book Contagious Architecture: Computation, Aesthetics and Space (2013) explores algorithms in architecture and interaction design as a symptom of global cultural transformation, where algorithmic computation represents a mode of thought that challenges dominant models of human cognition. Her current project, Automating Philosophy (forthcoming) explores the possibilities of a radical thought and critique which starts with inhuman intelligence and cosmocomputations. Part of this research has been published in recent articles “Media Ontology and Transcendental Instrumentality” (2019) and “Xenopatterning: Predictive Intuition and Automated Imagination” (2019).

“Acting Algorithms” — Mihaela Mihailova at Digital Aesthetics Workshop, May 26, 2023

Please join the Digital Aesthetics Workshop for our last event of the year with Mihaela Mihailova, who will present “Acting Algorithms: Animated Deepfake Performances in Contemporary Media” on Friday, May 26 from 1-3PM PT, where lunch will be served. The event will take place in McMurtry 007.

Zoom link for those unable to join in-person: https://tinyurl.com/3nnj32et

Abstract:

From the moving Mona Lisa deepfake created by the Moscow Samsung AI Center to the (re)animated life-size digital avatar of Salvador Dalí who greets visitors at the Dalí Museum in St. Petersburg, Florida, algorithmically generated performances are becoming integral to emerging media forms. As products of the collaboration between tech researchers, coders, animators, digital artists, and actors, as well as the labor of the (often deceased) makers of the original works, such amalgamated, multi-modal performances challenge existing definitions and conceptualizations of acting in/for the animated medium, along with notions of authorship and authenticity. Additionally, they expand the disciplinary reach and relevance of the subject, highlighting the necessity of thinking through contemporary digital animation’s relationship with data science and machine learning in order to better understand its ever-growing variety of non-filmic permutations.  

At the same time, fan-made deepfakes, ranging from movie mashups to unauthorized pornographic edits, further complicate the aesthetic and legal landscape of animated algorithmic performance. Juxtaposing these amateur, free, often low-quality videos and images with the commissioned, well-funded works described above reveals fascinating tensions between the institutional implementations of deepfakes and their popular use on online platforms.   

This talk explores the application, dissemination, and ontological status of deepfake performances across a variety of contexts, including digital artworks, viral videos, museum initiatives, and tech demos. It interrogates the practical, ideological, and ethical implications of their means of creation, including the digital “resurrection” of deceased individuals, the repurposing and rebranding of centuries-old artwork, and the superimposition of actors’ faces onto footage of other performers’ roles. It asks the following questions: who (or what) do these animated performances belong to? What new terms and approaches might be necessary in order to fully evaluate and account for their complicated relationship with existing theories of acting? How are they shaping – and being shaped by – contemporary animated media? 

Bio:

Mihaela Mihailova is Assistant Professor in the School of Cinema at San Francisco State University. She is the editor of Coraline: A Closer Look at Studio LAIKA’s Stop-Motion Witchcraft (Bloomsbury, 2021). She has published in Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, [in]Transition, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, Feminist Media Studies, animation: an interdisciplinary journal, and Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema.  

This event is generously co-sponsored by the Stanford McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society and Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies. Image credit goes to The Zizi Show, A Deepfake Drag Cabaret.

“Selfie/Portrait” — Damon Young at Digital Aesthetics Workshop, May 9, 2023

Please join the Digital Aesthetics Workshop for our next event with Damon Young, who will present “Selfie/Portrait” on Tuesday, May 9 from 5-7PM PT. The event will take place, as usual, in the Stanford Humanities Center Board Room. Find an abstract and bio attached, as well as a poster for lightweight circulation. Looking forward to seeing you there !

Zoom link for those unable to join in-person: tinyurl.com/aty2zf2a

Abstract:
The selfie, ubiquitous and quotidian, is a media form that has risen to preeminence in the digital environments of the twenty-first century. While it appears banal and superficial, I argue that it is for this very reason that the selfie indexes a larger transformation of subjectivity, akin to the kind Walter Benjamin, one hundred years ago, associated with the invention of early photography. The “self” of the selfie appears in a fundamental relationship to transformation (in both analog forms of body modification and surgery, and digital forms of filters and retouching) in the context of a circulation economy. These same terms indicate the axes along which the selfie refashions contemporary gender and sexuality. On the one hand, drawing unapologetically (if not always consciously) from the visual archive of pornography, the selfie advances the legacy of the “male gaze,” familiar from the history of narrative cinema. At the same time, it destabilizes both the gendered positions associated with that gaze, and their implicit heterosexuality. Moreover, unlike the cinema, the selfie is no longer a voyeuristic medium, but a medium of address. But to whom is it addressed? The answer to that question bears on the way it reconfigures the mediated field of contemporary sexuality. Often said to embody a contemporary “narcissism” — itself a feminized concept— the selfie also puts on view a subject who is no longer an individual but is becoming-generic. At the fault line between historically transforming media paradigms in their intersection with transforming paradigms of gender, sexuality, and desire, the selfie allows us to take the measure of the tensions between the common and the singular, the generic and the particular, as well as the self-satisfied and the anxious, that shape the contours of a contemporary cultural logic.

Bio:
Damon Young is co-appointed with the department of French and is affiliated with the Program in Critical Theory, the Berkeley Center for New Media, the Institute for European Studies, and the Designated Emphasis in Women, Gender & Sexuality. He teaches courses on art cinema, on sexuality and media, and on topics in digital media and film theory (including classical film theory, phenomenology, psychoanalysis, semiotics, feminist and queer theory). His first book, Making Sex Public and Other Cinematic Fantasies was published in the Theory Q series at Duke University Press in 2018, and shortlisted for the 2019 Association for the Study of the Arts of the Present Book Prize. That book examines fears and fantasies about women’s and queer sexualities—as figures for social emancipation or social collapse–in French and US cinema since the mid-1950s. It also considers the way cinema produces a new model of the private self as it challenges the novel’s dominance in the twentieth century. The latter idea is the basis for Professor Young’s current book project, After the Private Self, which explores the technical and technological ground of subjectivity across media forms, from the written diary through to big data, algorithms, and contemporary Internet cultures. Is the self of Rousseau’s Confessions the same as the self of the digital selfie? The inquiry integrates topics in digital media theory with “earlier” questions of language and subjectivity.

“The Right to Speed-Watch (or, When Netflix Discovered its Blind Users)” — Neta Alexander at Digital Aesthetics Workshop, April 18, 2023

Please join us for our next Digital Aesthetics Workshop event with Neta Alexander, who will deliver “The Right to Speed-Watch (or, When Netflix Discovered its Blind Users).” The meeting will take place April 18th from 5-7pm in the Stanford Humanities Center Board Room, as usual. Below find a description of the talk, a bio for Neta, and a poster for lightweight distribution. Looking forward to seeing you there!

Zoom registration for those unable to attend in person: https://tinyurl.com/2yc6eshy

Description:
Speed-watching, an understudied-yet-ubiquitous spectatorial mode, is often described by users as a productivity tool that can help them become digital “super-users.” This talk situates this emerging mode of spectatorship within longer histories of media consumption, connecting it to both efficiency and disability activism. Using Netflix as a case study, I focus on the recent public debate surrounding its failed attempt to add a playback speed feature to its streaming platform. World-renowned filmmakers pushed Netflix to shelve this idea when it was first introduced in 2018, claiming their films were not intended to be watched twice as fast. Yet, citing “requests from deaf and blind subscribers,” Netflix decided to add this feature to its interface in August 2020, when millions were sheltering-in-place due to the pandemic. This presentation asks what led to this decision, and what can the marketing discourse surrounding it teach us about how corporations monetize “accessibility.” Theorizing the difference between “time-shifting” and “time-hacking”, I argue that speed-watching is a mode of survival enabling different users to advance a wide range of goals: media literacy, the thrill of speed, and avoiding a mortifying fear of boredom.

Bio:
Neta Alexander is an Assistant Professor of Film and Media at Colgate University, NY and an Assistant Editor of the Journal of Cinema and Media Studies (JCMS). Her articles have appeared in Journal of Visual Culture, Cinema Journal, Cinergie, Film Quarterly, Media Fields Journal, and Flow Journal, among other publications. Her first book, Failure (co-authored with Arjun Appadurai; Polity, 2020) studies how Silicon Valley and Wall Street monetize failure and forgetfulness.

M. Beatrice Fazi at Digital Aesthetics Workshop, February 28!

Poster by Hank Gerba

Please join us for our next event with M. Beatrice Fazi on Tuesday February 28 @ 5-7pm Pacific time. We’ll meet in the Stanford Humanities Center, as usual. Zoom Registration, if not able to attend IRL: https://tinyurl.com/39tsjc62

The topic of Beatrice’s talk is “On Digital Theory.”

Abstract:

What is digital theory? In this talk, M. Beatrice Fazi will advance and discuss two parallel propositions that aim to answer that question: first, that digital theory is a theory that investigates the digital as such and, second, that it is a theory that is digital insofar as it discretizes via abstraction. Fazi will argue that digital theory should offer a systematic and systematizing study of the digital in and of itself. In other words, it should investigate what the digital is, and that investigation should identify the distinctive ontological determinations and specificities of the digital. This is not the only scope of a theoretical approach to the digital, but it constitutes a central moment for digital theory, a moment that defines digital theory through the search for the definition of the digital itself. Fazi will also consider how, if we wish to understand what digital theory is, we must address the characteristics of theoretical analysis, which can be done only by reflecting on what thinking is in the first place. Definitions of the digital, definitions of thought, and definitions of theory all meet at a key conceptual juncture. To explain this, Fazi will discuss how to theorize is to engage in abstracting and that both are processes of discretization. The talk will conclude by considering whether the digital could be understood as a mode of thought as well as a mode of representing thought. 

Bio:

M. Beatrice Fazi is Reader in Digital Humanities in the School of Media, Arts and Humanities at the University of Sussex, United Kingdom. Her primary areas of expertise are the philosophy of computation, the philosophy of technology and the emerging field of media philosophy. Her research focuses on the ontologies and epistemologies produced by contemporary technoscience, particularly in relation to issues in artificial intelligence and computation and to their impact on culture and society. She has published extensively on the limits and potentialities of the computational method, on digital aesthetics and on the automation of thought. Her monograph Contingent Computation: Abstraction, Experience, and Indeterminacy in Computational Aesthetics was published by Rowman & Littlefield International in 2018.

CFP: 2023 Stanford-Leuphana Academy for Media Studies — “Media and Cultural Change”

I am happy to announce the call for papers for the 4th annual Stanford-Leuphana Academy for Media Studies, which will again take place in Berlin (June 25-30, 2023)! 

The topic this year is “Media and Cultural Change”

Our core faculty this year are:

  • Timon Beyes (Sociology of Organisation and Culture, Leuphana)
  • Shane Denson (Film and Media Studies, Stanford)
  • Marisa Galvez (French, Italian, and German Studies, Stanford)
  • Karla Oeler (Film and Media Studies, Stanford)
  • Claus Pias (History and Epistemology of Media, Leuphana)
  • Fred Turner (Communication, Stanford)
  • Sybille Krämer (Philosophy, Leuphana)
  • Ruth Mayer (American Studies, Hannover)
  • Bernhard Siegert (History and Epistemology of Cultural Techniques, Weimar)

Special Guests:

  • Simon Denny (University of Fine Arts Hamburg)
  • Wolfgang Ernst (Media Studies, Humboldt University Berlin) — to be confirmed

As in previous years, travel and accommodation costs will be covered for graduate students accepted to the Academy, and there will be no additional fees for participation. So please consider applying and spread the word to qualified graduate students!

Intermediations: Patrick Jagoda, “Metagames and Media Aesthetics” (January 27, 2023)

Recently, I announced an upcoming event featuring the Game Changer Lab Chicago, founded by Melissa Gilliam and Patrick Jagoda, as part of the new Critical Making Collaborative at Stanford. I am pleased now to announce another event featuring Patrick Jagoda, the following day, as part of my other new initiative this year at Stanford: the Intermediations series, which is dedicated to exploring the intersections of intermediality and interdisciplinarity.

On January 27, at 12pm in the Terrace Room of Margaret Jacks Hall, Professor Jagoda of the University of Chicago will be presenting on “Metagames and Media Aesthetics.” Please see below for an abstract and bio, and hope to see some of you there!

“Metagames and Media Aesthetics”

Broadly circulating humanistic terms such as “metafiction” (William H. Gass), “metapictures” (WJT Mitchell), and “metacomics” (M. Thomas Inge) point to heightened self-reflexivity within a medium or form. Particularly since the 2010s, we have seen an increased volume of “metagames” or games about games that include prominent independent game examples such as The Stanley Parable (2013),Doki Doki Literature Club! (2017), and There is No Game (2020). This presentation explores different theories and categories of metagames en route to the question of why metagames are so important to understanding our contemporary media ecology in 2023. Video games in general, and metagames in particular, call for an expanded sense of media aesthetics that exceed Roland Barthes’s earlier triumvirate of image, music, and text. This talk theorizes the videogame sensorium and its broader implications for media studies.

Bio:

Patrick Jagoda is the William Rainey Harper Professor of Cinema & Media Studies, English, and Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Chicago. He is Executive Editor of Critical Inquiry and director of the Weston Game Lab, as well as co-founder of the Game Changer Chicago Design Lab and Transmedia Story Lab. Patrick’s books include Network Aesthetics (2016), The Game Worlds of Jason Rohrer (2016 with Michael Maizels), Experimental Games: Critique, Play, and Design in the Age of Gamification (2020), and Transmedia Stories: Narrative Methods for Public Health and Social Justice (2022 with Ireashia Bennett and Ashlyn Sparrow). He has also co-edited five special issues or edited volumes, and published over fifty essays and interviews. Patrick designs transmedia, digital and analog games, including the climate change alternate reality game Terrarium (2019), which received the 2020 IndieCade award for the best Location Based and Live Play Design. He is a recipient of a 2020 Guggenheim Fellowship.

“Code” — Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan at Digital Aesthetics Workshop (Jan. 17, 2023)

Poster by Hank Gerba

Please join us on Tuesday, January 17th @ 5-7pm, in the Stanford Humanities Center Board Room, for a very special event with Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan. Bernard’s new book, Code: From Information Theory to French Theory, releases just 3 days later on January 20th (https://www.dukeupress.edu/code) ! At Digital Aesthetics he will be discussing the book as well as his future project, Screenscapes: How Formats Render Territories.

Zoom registration, if you can’t make it IRL: https://tinyurl.com/4dhyjuna.

Bio:
Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan is a Reader in the History and Theory of Digital Media (loosely equivalent to associate or w2 professorship)​. An overarching theme of his research is how “cultural” sciences shape—and are shaped by—digital media. This concern spans his writing on the mutual constitution of cybernetics and the human sciences, ethnicity and AI, and the role of mid-twentieth century military vigilance in the development of interactive, multimedia computing.  His attention to cultural factors in technical systems also figured in his work as a curator, notably for the Anthropocene and Technosphere projects at the Haus der Kulturen der Welt.

Bernard’s book Code: From Information Theory to French Theory examines how liberal technocratic projects, with roots in colonialism, mental health, and industrial capitalism, shaped early conceptions of digital media and cybernetics. It offers a revisionist history of “French Theory” as an effort to come to terms with technical ideas of communications and as a predecessor to the digital humanities. N. Katherine Hayles wrote of this book that it “upends standard intellectual histories” and Lev Manovich that “after reading this original and fascinating book, you will never look at key thinkers of the twentieth century in the same way.” Early drafts of the book’s argument appeared in journals including Grey Room and Critical Inquiry.

Bernard’s current book project, Screenscapes: How Formats Render Territories, draws on infrastructure studies and format studies to offer a radical account of how digital screens produce global space. It considers the digital interface in terms of articulation, i.e., in its technoscientific formatting of territories, temporalities, and practices as “ecologies of operations.” Excerpts appear in Representations (An Ecology of Operations) and MLN  (The Bitmap is the Territory).

Video: Mads Thomsen, “Adjusting to the Age of Automated Writing” (Intermediations, Nov. 16, 2022)

Video from the inaugural event of INTERMEDIATIONS, a new workshop and lecture series foregrounding issues of intermediality and interdisciplinarity: Mads Rosendahl Thomsen, “Adjusting to the Age of Automated Writing” from November 16, 2022.

Abstract:

Writing was for at least six to seven thousand years a humanly hand-crafted product. Now we encounter several kinds of technologies that change the production of text profoundly. Chatbots, automated translation, grammar assistants, and large language models are examples of how text generation permeates writing from many angles. In this presentation, Professor Mads Thomsen sketches out key issues of the rapid developments in text generation and the interdisciplinary collaboration needed to understand these, before turning to how GPT-3 “reads” William Carlos Williams’ poem “The Red Wheelbarrow.”

Bio:

Mads Rosendahl Thomsen is Professor of Comparative Literature at Aarhus University, Denmark. He has published in the fields of literary historiography, modernist literature, world literature, digital humanities, and posthumanism. His most recently submitted publication is a short book on the concept and history of text.

He is the author of Mapping World Literature: International Canonization and Transnational Literatures (2008),The New Human in Literature: Posthuman Visions of Changes in Body, Mind and Society after 1900 (2013), a co-author with Stefan Helgesson ofLiterature and the World (2019), and the editor of fourteen books, includingWorld Literature: A Reader (2012), The Posthuman Condition: Ethics, Aesthetics and Politics of Biotechnological Challenges (2012),Danish Literature as World Literature (2017), Literature: An Introduction to Theory and Analysis (2017), and The Bloomsbury Handbook of Posthumanism (2020).